[RappY]

În prealabil postat de Demetrius

Eu am citat din Wikipedia ce mi s-a parut a fi o scurta sustinere a evolutiei, dar daca tu spui ca in continuare el combate evolutia, atunci poate ca se "pierde in certuri".



PS
Ai la indemana pasajul(linkul) cu argumentarile lui impotrriva evolutiei(ca eu nu l-am gasit)?

Gasesti pasajul citat de tine aici, unde vorbeste de Vasile cel Mare, sub sectiunea "Development, Not Evolution": http://orthodoxinfo.com/phronema/evo...kalomiros.aspx

Argumentele lui sunt in general bazate pe ideea ca nu ar fi destule dovezi pentru evolutia de la o specie la alta, ci doar pentru evolutia din cadrul unei specii. Concluzia lui este ca teoria evolutiei ar fi daunatoare ortodoxiei:

În prealabil postat de Fr. Seraphim Rose

The sophisticated, worldly-wise laugh at those who call evolution a "heresy." True, evolution is not strictly speaking a heresy; neither is Hinduism, strictly speaking, a heresy: but like Hinduism (with which it is indeed related, and which probably had an influence on its development) evolutionism is an ideology that is profoundly foreign to the teaching of Orthodox Christianity, and it involves one in so many wrong doctrines and attitudes that it would be far better if it were simple a heresy and could thus be easily identified and combated. Evolutionism is closely bound up with the whole apostate mentality of the rotten "Christianity" of the West; it is a vehicle of the whole "new spirituality" and "new Christianity" in which the devil is now striving to submerge the last true Christians. It offers an alternative explanation of creation to that of the holy Fathers; it allows an Orthodox Christian under its influence to read the Holy Scriptures and not understand them, automatically "adjusting" the text to fit his preconceived philosophy of nature. Its acceptance cannot but involve the acceptance also of alternative explanations of other parts of Divine revelation, of an automatic "adjustment" of other Scriptural and patristic texts to fit in with modern "wisdom."