Citat:
În prealabil postat de AlinB
Citat din link -ul dat de tine:
"There is indirect evidence that the OC produces a thinner, less glandular, less vascular lining, and there is direct evidence from the field of in vitro fertilization that a thinner, less glandular, less vascular lining is less likely to allow the attachment of the new human being when it enters the uterus."
OC = oral contraceptives
Deci evidente exista doar ca spune individul, teoretic ar trebui ca ovulatia (care n-a reusit sa fie stopata de CO) sa determine productie de hormoni care cica ar trebui sa "suprascrie" efectul CO cu scop avortiv asupra mucoasei uterine.
Iar ceea ce este evidente si demonstrat stiintific incearca sa fie contrazis de ceea ce este in principiu doar o teorie.
In concluzie, exista suficiente suspiciuni despre efectul lor avortiv. si cum ziceam, chiar si un 0,00000001% e suficient.
Matalutza iti place ruleta ruseasca avand ca miza vesnicia?
|
The proponents of the “hostile endometrium theory” argue that OCs are abortifacient based upon the third mechanism of action. The medical literature clearly supports the claim that the uterus becomes thinner and less glandular as a result of the OCs, however, the medical literature comes to this conclusion from non-ovulatory pill cycles. It is assumed that this finding in non-ovulatory pill cycles would prevent implantation of the embryo conceived in an ovulatory pill cycle, but this presumption is false. If a woman on OCs ovulates and conceives, everything changes: through the HCG’s affect on the corpus luteum, and the corpus luteum’s release of high levels of estrogen and progesterone, the uterus is able to nourish its new guest very well.
Interesant articol. Mie mi se pare un foarte bun argument ca pilulele contraceptive nu inhiba de fapt nidarea.