Citat:
În prealabil postat de antiecumenism
-nu e vorba doar de mercur ci de o gramada de efecte negative ale vaccinurilor,de minciuna in care ne tin mafiotii astia,chiar si oficialii,e vorba de dezinformare,e vorba de multe
-vorba asta "nu inghitii tot ce zboara" ti se aplica si tie,adica nu tine cont de manipularea din massmedia,nu tine cont doar de parerea oficiala care e influntata de marile companii de vaccinuri,cu alte cuvinte nu te lasa manipulat
|
Diethelm and McKee have identified five characteristics of denialists:[9]
The identification of perceived conspiracies (including belief of corrupted peer review and inversionism).[10]
(avem: massmedia manipulanta, mafia vaccinurilor)
The use of fake experts (often with the smearing of real experts). (avem)
Selecting or cherry picking sources: picking the weakest papers or only ones that are contrary. Particularly worrisome is looking at only a single study, especially in medicine, as one study rarely conclusively proves something.[11] Others note that this includes anecdotal evidence[2] and quote mining.[12] (avem)
Demanding impossible standards for research. (nu sunt sigur daca a aparut si asta in thread).
Use of fallacy, including misrepresentation and false analogy.[13] Informally, this can include a witch's brew of half-truths and sob stories.[14] and/or spin to try to force the public to ignore an important issue. (si inca cum).