Nu incepe cu erorile de logica. Eu doar iti ceream dovezi, nu simple vorbe in vant. Descoperirile lor sunt fictionale pentru ca..... (Completeaza aici).

Logical fallacies: (Le recunosti?)
1. Attacking your opponent’s character or personal traits in
an attempt to undermine their argument.
Ad hominem attacks can take the form of overtly attacking somebody, or casting
doubt on their character. The result of an ad hom attack can be to undermine
someone without actually engaging with the substance of their argument.

2. A circular argument in which the conclusion is included
in the premise.
This logically incoherent argument often arises in situations where people
have an assumption that is very ingrained, and therefore taken in their minds
as a given. Circular reasoning is bad mostly because it’s not very good.

3. Assuming that what’s true about one part of something
has to be applied to all, or other, parts of it.
Often when something is true for the part it does also apply to the whole, but
because this isn’t always the case it can’t be presumed to be true. We must
show evidence for why a consistency will exist.

4. Using personal experience or an isolated example instead
of a valid argument, especially to dismiss statistics.
It’s often much easier for people to believe someone’s testimony as opposed to
understanding variation across a continuum. Scientific and statistical measures
are almost always more accurate than individual perceptions and experiences.

5. Presuming a claim to be necessarily wrong because a
fallacy has been committed.
It is entirely possibly to make a claim that is false yet argue with logical
coherency for that claim, just as is possible to make a claim that is true and
justify it with various fallacies and poor arguments.

6. Saying that because one finds something dicult to
understand, it’s therefore not true.
Subjects such as biological evolution via the process of natural selection
require a good amount of understanding before one is able to properly grasp
them; this fallacy is usually used in place of that understanding.

Faptul ca tu, dupa ce ai citat un articol, ai pus "cata imaginatie" nu zice nimic, si nu reprezinta un contra-atac la adresa acestuia. Daca vrei intr-adevar sa critici aceste descoperiri, adu argumente care sa-ti sustina afirmatiile.