View Single Post
  #579  
Vechi 19.07.2016, 18:12:21
Patrie si Credinta's Avatar
Patrie si Credinta Patrie si Credinta is offline
Senior Member
 
Data înregistrării: 24.05.2011
Locație: Ploiesti
Religia: Ortodox
Mesaje: 1.536
Send a message via Skype™ to Patrie si Credinta
Implicit

Citat:
În prealabil postat de antoniap Vezi mesajul
Catolicii au crucea răsturnată. Nu e vina catolicilor de rand, ci a celor care le- au prezentat-o ca fiind corecta. Crucea ortodoxa este crucea pe care S-a răstignit Mântuitorul. Și atunci de ce sa nu se ia ei după noi? Umărul drept, umărul stâng, frunte și buric. Nu o cruce răsturnată din toate punctele de vedere, ca la catolici! Crucea adevărată mântuieste, iar crucea strâmbă osândește.
Nu e rasturnata, e in oglinda.
Chiar, exista articole mai detaliate despre istoria semnului crucii?
Ca din cate vad, a fost intr-o continua evolutie(1 deget pe frunte, 2 degete cu tot corpul, apoi cei care credeau in diofisitism au bagat 3, ca sa marturiseasca asta). Pe langa restul simbolisticii.

The right cross, still practiced by Eastern Orthodox believers, symbolizes how "Christ descended from the heavens to the earth, and from the Jews (right) He passed to the Gentiles (left)," according to Pope Innocent III. In Roman Catholic practice, the left cross has become standard, showing, (in one of many interpretations) that the believer hopes to be not on Christ's left—with the goats, as in Jesus' parable—at the day of judgment, but on Christ's right.

If these layers of theological density seem out of place with the simple beauty of the two-part motion of the sign of the cross, Andreopoulos explains that all symbols

keep within them a multitude of meanings that they were given intentionally and also unconsciously. Upon reflecting on these signs, the faithful find that these meanings are made available. The sign, as an act, however small it may be, expresses the impetus of crossing the threshold between thinking in theological terms and practicing the Christian life.


In orice caz, si Armenii o fac stanga-dreapta.
Probabil influenta apuseana, dar asta inseamna ca aceasta influenta precede schisma de la Chalcedonul, sau cel putin primul mileniul.

Deci, much ado about nothing.
Lasa, sa se intoarca ei la canoanele primului mileniu, si ii acceptam si asa.
__________________
Every point of view is useful, even those that are wrong - if we can judge why a wrong view was accepted.
Reply With Quote