[AlinB]

Vad ca nimeni nu vrea sa citeasca care sunt recomadarile/pozitia UE vizavi de educatia sexuala.
Uite niste citate, ca subiect de meditatie, pentru cei care stiu limba engleza:

Three categories of programme
From a historical global perspective, sexuality education programmes can basically be grouped into three categories.

1. Programmes which focus primarily or exclusively on abstaining from sexual intercourse before marriage, known as “how to say no” or “abstinence only” programmes (Type 1).

2. Programmes which include abstinence as an option, but also pay attention to contraception and safe sex practices. These programmes are often referred to as “comprehensive sexuality education”, as compared with “abstinence only” (Type 2).

3. Programmes which include the Type 2 elements, and also put them in a wider perspective of personal and sexual growth and development. These are referred to in this document as “holistic sexuality education” (Type 3).

Programmes of the first type were strongly promoted and supported by the United States Republican administration over the past decade, and to some extent they have also influenced developments elsewhere, particularly in some developing and Eastern European countries. Programmes of the second type have been developed as a reaction to the “abstinence only” approach. An extensive study comparing the results of programmes of the fi rstand second type in the United States of America 10 Cf. NESCO et al. (2009a), p.13 ff. has indicated that “abstinence only” programmes have no positive effects on sexual behaviour or the risk of teenage pregnancy, whereas comprehensive
programmes do have such an effect.11

Deci vedeti ce zic oamenii astia, pe baza unor studii aprofundate, s-a demonstrat ca educatia pentru abstinenta nu are efect.
Copiii nu asculta.

Nu se sufla insa nici un cuvant despre programele de tip 2, daca au rezultatele scontate sau nu.

Mai mult chiar, se pare ca nici nu exista o distinctie f. clara intre ele:

The boundaries between the second and third type of programme are not strict and mainly depend on definition.

Unfortunately, in the United States of America, there are almost only programmes of the f rst and second type, whereas in Western Europe programmes of the third type predominate. The international literature on sexuality education is, almost by defi nition, in the English language, but most of the documents on sexuality education in Europe, whether they be guidelines, handbooks, teaching materials or even evaluation reports, are in national European languages. Because these are usually inaccessible for an international readership, this easily creates the false impression that English-language programmes, most of them originating from the United States of America, are
almost the only ones in existence.

Aici ni se spune ca americanii sunt prosti pentru ca europenii au inventat un sistem mai destept, numarul 3.

It is important to stress at this point that Type 3 programmes start from a philosophy that is different from Type 1 and 2. The latter tend to be much more “tangible-results-oriented”, concentrating particularly on behavioural results.

Care tinde sa dea rezultate mai bune (nu foarte sigur, probabil tot in functie de interpretare) decat celelalte doua (se pare ca ambele sunt falimentare pana la urma).

Important questions for the evaluation of these Type 1 and 2 sexuality education curriculums include: “Is the
programme delaying the age of fi rst intercourse?”; “Is it reducing the number of sexual partners?”; or even “Does it reduce the frequency of sexual intercourse?”.

Deci, intentiile sunt bune, teoretic.
Desi, categoric e ipocrit pusa problema - intr-o societate care sexul se vinde la televizor, e la liber ba mai mult, preaslavit, mediatizat, etc. sa ai pretentia sa repari toate daunele produse de sistemul asta cu cateva ore de scoala e de-a dreptul hilar.