Pentru toti e o zona de interes, da' vezi cine a destabilizat mai intai zona in cauza si a facut lucrurile sa ajunga pana aici.
Rebelii carora li se spune acum "moderati" care nu cu multi ani in urma erau teroristul nr. 1 al lumii (gen Al-Qaeda).
Si pentru taietori de capete, "ziaristul" din spatele reportajului cu baietelul simbol, chiar le-a publicat o taiere de cap a altui, baiat de 10-12 ani.
Citat:
"According to some media reports, photographer Mahmoud Raslan was previously identified in photos with members of the US-backed Harakat Nour al-Din al-Zinki group that beheaded a Palestinian-Syrian child in July. We can’t expect photojournalists to be devoid of political leanings, but should Raslan’s association with an organization that has been implicated in beheadings alter our perception of the Omran image? Or is the image remarkable irrespective of who took it?
We can take the thought experiment further. What if Raslan’s image wins the top prize at World Press Photo? What if the best civil rights image had been taken by a racist? What if the best 9/11 photo was taken by an al Qaeda sympathizer? Should we celebrate an image with a complex provenance?"
|
https://petapixel.com/2016/08/24/care-took-photo/
Syria conflict: Boy beheaded by rebels 'was fighter'
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-36843990