Teoria Big-Bang o eroare. Alta la rand.

[iuliu46]

Ia uite cu ce se ocupa fizicienii :

https://www.newscientist.com/article...risingly-weak/


"The idea is a little wild,” admits Tim Cohen at the University of Oregon in Eugene, who teamed up with Arkani-Hamed and others to work on the new theory. “The absence of new physics at the LHC has motivated us to – instead of introducing a few new particles – introduce 10^16 new particles.”

Deci daca nu gasesti nici urma de particule la accelerator, care-i solutia ? Spui ca nu-s doar cateva lipsa, sunt cateva miliarde de miliarde de particule. Ca in cazul multiversului. Daca nu poti sa-l explici pe asta, spui ca-s miliarde de miliarde de miliarde de universuri.

[Florin-Ionut]

În prealabil postat de iuliu46

Ia uite cu ce se ocupa fizicienii :

https://www.newscientist.com/article...risingly-weak/


"The idea is a little wild,” admits Tim Cohen at the University of Oregon in Eugene, who teamed up with Arkani-Hamed and others to work on the new theory. “The absence of new physics at the LHC has motivated us to – instead of introducing a few new particles – introduce 10^16 new particles.”

Deci daca nu gasesti nici urma de particule la accelerator, care-i solutia ? Spui ca nu-s doar cateva lipsa, sunt cateva miliarde de miliarde de particule. Ca in cazul multiversului. Daca nu poti sa-l explici pe asta, spui ca-s miliarde de miliarde de miliarde de universuri.

maybe...
a new theory...
if...
occam's razor... :)
an exciting possibility...
a little wild... :))

yeah, sure