|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Înregistrare | Autentificare | Întrebări frecvente | Mesaje Private | Căutare | Mesajele zilei | Marchează forumurile citite |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Moduri de afișare |
|
#491
29.01.2015, 18:27:51
|
|||
|
|||
Citat:
Iar evolutia nu este nicidecum lipsita de fundament stiintific. Am postat destul de multe "fundamente" in threadul din sectiunea de stiinta. Gasesti aceste informatii cu un simplu google: http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolib...hp?topic_id=46 Last edited by abaaaabbbb63; 29.01.2015 at 18:30:14. 
|
|
#492
29.01.2015, 18:31:29
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
|
|
#493
29.01.2015, 18:34:25
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
Citat:
|
|
#494
29.01.2015, 18:38:12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
In legatura cu acel filmulet: manipulare, propaganda, si falsificare de informatie. "The Paluxy River Tracks, which caused a bit of a sensation back when they were first discovered, turned out to be a hoax. Thus the "astounding" nature of the find finds itself utterly discredited, and puts good old Carl Baugh, one of the Young Earth Creationists featured on the show, in the loony bin. The Klerksdorp Spheres have been explained as concretions made in volcanic sediments, and many of the claims made by the show regarding the spheres (that they are all perfectly round and made of an alloy which does not occur naturally) are false (none of the "spheres" have the same shape, they are also imperfect in shape and are most definitely not made of any kind of metal). Tiwanaku has been dated several times using carbon dating, and Arthur Posnansky dated the site before the discovery of the aforementioned method. The site also underwent much destruction and vandalism, and in order to accurately date a site using astronomy, the site must have remained undisturbed for a very long period. This is definitely not the case at Tiwanaku, where many of its structures were destroyed and even moved during the Spanish colonial period. The pyramids in Central America and Egypt are different in both design and use. Egyptian pyramids were tombs and were made to have smooth sides whereas their American equivalents had a step structure and were used as temples. There is also no written evidence in any of these cultures (the Mayans, Aztecs and Egyptians all had alphabets) indicating contact between the two civilisations and/or an original source for either culture. The Piri Reis map, which shows Antarctica free of ice, is definitely not accurate in its portrayal of the land mass beneath the Antarctic ice (as the show claimed it was). The area the show (and its so-called "expert" Graham Hancock) claims to be Antarctica could simply be a fanciful addition of a "Terra Incognita", which was a common thing back in those days." Last edited by abaaaabbbb63; 29.01.2015 at 18:41:21.
|
|
#495
29.01.2015, 18:45:19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
|
|
#496
29.01.2015, 19:00:18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
cine a creat dolarul ? Adica tu imi poti explica evolutia temperaturii dintr-un ceaun pus pe foc dar nu-mi poti explica de ce creste temperatura ?  "Stiu cum evolueaza dar nu stiu cauza evolutie ?" Pai daca nu stii cauza unei actiuni, n-ai cum sa stii evolutia ei,  Teoria asta a evolutie este doar o teorie politica , mascata sub forma unei teorii stiintifice. Dar stii ca acum astia "cei cu evolutionismul" vor schimba teoria evolutie cu transhumanismul ? (H+), care tot o teorie politica mascata sub forma unei teorii stiintifice ? Adica "domne asta cum maimutza nu mai tine, hai s-o incercam pe asta cu robotul". Dar stai, stai ca nu se termina aici. Mai vine si Ridley Scott cu alta teorie mascata sub forma unui film(Prometheus) care spune ca niste extraterestrii rai si egoisti ne-au creat. Adica daca nu mai merge cu darwinismul , hai cu transhumanismul si cu un eventual teosofism mai evoluat, modificat pe aici pe colo de universul din seria "Alien". Dar stai, ca incep altii sa vina cu cosmologia(un fel de miserupism intelectual) in care nu conteaza daca stii sau nu cum a aparut omul si nu conteaza unde se indreapta omul. Of Doamne... 
|
|
#497
29.01.2015, 19:02:38
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
|
|
#498
29.01.2015, 19:10:26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
In exemplul cu ceanulul: procesul de evolutie este cresterea temperaturii. Teoria evolutiei este rapunsul intrebarii "de ce creste temperatura?", iar raspunsul intrebarii "cum a aparut apa in ceaun" nu este necesara pentru explicarea cresterii temperaturii. Citat:
Ce voiam sa spun: Pana nu darami un perete, nu stii daca acela era perete sa nu? :)) Last edited by abaaaabbbb63; 29.01.2015 at 19:12:55.
|
|
#499
29.01.2015, 19:16:14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
ai impresia ca stii evolutia dolarului, insa in realitatea este inselare. Citat:
|
|
#500
29.01.2015, 19:19:49
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
Vezi? Explicatia nu necesita ceva de genul "Mama a pus apa in ceaun". "De ce" nu necesita si explicatii de origine in cazul acesta.
|
|
|
Mod linear
