Dinozaurii -----> ce spune ortodoxia despre ei?

[Vladimir13]

În prealabil postat de Scotianul

Chiar daca s-ar fi dorit mentionarea dinozaurilor in Biblie,s-ar fi ivit o serioasa problema: ,,There is no word for "dinosaur" in the Hebrew language".Insa ramine in discutie o intrebare complicata:oamenii si dinozaurii au trait in aceleasi timpuri?Bineinteles ca orice adept al stiintei din prezent ar zimbi ingaduitor precum in fata unei intrebari venite din partea unui retardat dar sa vedem daca lucrurile sunt chiar asa categorice:

1.,,There is a growing body of evidence that dinosaurs and humans were contemporary. In 1970 newspapers reported the discovery of cave paintings in Zimbabwe. The paintings were made by bushmen who ruled that area from about 1500 B.C., until a couple of hundred years ago. Along with accurate representations of the elephant and the giraffe, is a painting of an Apatosaurus (brontosaurus). These art works have greatly puzzled scientists since bushmen are known to have painted from real life".

Faza este simpla>daca arborigenii din Zimbabwe pictau exclusiv(se subliniaza asta mai sus) scene din viata reala>de unde stiau de Apatosaurus?

2. ,,About seventy years ago, Dr. Samuel Hubbard, curator of archaeology in the Oakland (California) Museum, discovered dinosaur carvings on the cliff walls of the Hava Supai Canyon in Arizona. One remarkable carving resembles a Tyrannosaurus. Nearby, dinosaur tracks were preserved in the rock surface."

Aceiasi intrebare:de unde au stiut de existenta Tyrannosaurus de au cioplit statuete cu el in acesta locatie adica Hava Supai Canyon.Sa nu mai zic ca diferite temple din vechime continueau asa ceva sau asa ceva .Vi-se par cunoscute aceste imagini?Cum au stiut de asa ceva?Insa as fi interesat sa stiu ce cauta un astronaut pe Catedrala din Salamanca


Recunosc..am multe intrebari

http://www.christiancourier.com/arti...-and-the-bible

,,The Place for Reasonable Faith"este,metaforic vorbind,un mic loc de simbioza,pe stil picnic, creationisto-evolutionist.,,Reasonable"este numele mic din buletin al notiunii de ,,compromis"cateodata.Din articol (vad ca nu sunt singurul macinat de intrebari)>,,If one accepts the plain testimony of the Bible, with no compulsion to harmonize Scripture with evolutionary assertions, there is no doubt but that dinosaurs and humans were contemporary".Acel ,,If" este mare cat o istorie de cateva milioane de ani si este in plina dezbatere,concluzie la care a ajuns si autorul> ,,Needless to say, this controversy is far from over."

Dar finalul contine un paradox de toata frumusetea>,,Those who accept the testimony of the Bible are confident that men and dinosaurs did occupy the ancient earth at the same time. We are not dependent upon modern discoveries to confirm that for us. However, when clear evidence does come to light, we should not hesitate to accept it."Ceva de tipul>,,Noi mergem pe mina Bibliei,nu stam in argumentatii stiintifice dar daca vor aparea nu ne opreste nimic sa le acceptam".Cum am spus mai sus>,,Reasonable"este,cateodata, numele mic din buletin al notiunii de ,,compromis".Referitor la acesta ,,Thin Red Line" de pe campul de lupta dintre creationism si evolutionism>inca meditez si nu din perspectiva nemuririi sufletului.

Exista 2 pericole in tot acest demers de a armoniza stiinta si religia sau in a le desparti: pericolul comodului compromis,cand se ard rationamente pentru a se lipi concluziile si pericolul radicalismului (pe stil,metaforic vorbind, manga zone) in care se anuleaza argumente,doar in baza unor prejudecati,si astfel se pierd legaturi valoroase.Spre diferenta de subsemnatul care ,,Recunosc am multe intrebari" Wayne se pare ca stabilit deja concluzia pe cele 2 situatii ultra-discutate.

As remarca inceputul articolului>,,If dinosaurs existed 200 million years before Adam and Eve it does not present any problem to a literal understanding of the Genesis record ".Si daca a existat vreodata o veriga lipsa intre ,,a creea" si ,,a evolua" atunci acesta concluzie este un slam-dunk dpdv logic,teologic,stiintific.

Oh dear...