Forum Crestin Ortodox Crestin Ortodox
 
 


Du-te înapoi   Forum Crestin Ortodox > Generalitati > Generalitati
 
 
Thread Tools Moduri de afișare
  #11  
Vechi 13.01.2010, 13:03:23
topcat
Guest
 
Mesaje: n/a
Implicit

Citat:
În prealabil postat de Imogene Vezi mesajul
Multumesc pentru explicatii, stereox. Ai explicat pe intelesul meu. :) Ma uitam in wikipedia si am vazut ca explica tipurile de agnosticism. Tu unde te situezi?

"Agnosticism can be subdivided into several categories. Recently suggested variations include:

Strong agnosticism (also called "hard," "closed," "strict," or "permanent agnosticism")

the view that the question of the existence or nonexistence of a deity or deities and the nature of ultimate reality is unknowable by reason of our natural inability to verify any experience with anything but another subjective experience. A strong agnostic would say, "I cannot know whether a deity exists or not, and neither can you."

Weak agnosticism (also called "soft," "open," "empirical," or "temporal agnosticism")
the view that the existence or nonexistence of any deities is currently unknown but is not necessarily unknowable, therefore one will withhold judgment until/if any evidence is available. A weak agnostic would say, "I don't know whether any deities exist or not, but maybe one day when there is evidence we can find something out."

Apathetic agnosticism (also called Pragmatic agnosticism)
the view that there is no proof of either the existence or nonexistence of any deity, but since any deity that may exist appears unconcerned for the universe or the welfare of its inhabitants, the question is largely academic.[citation needed]

Agnostic atheism
the view of those who do not claim to know of the existence of any deity, but do not believe in any.[15]

Agnostic theism (also called "spiritual agnosticism")
the view of those who do not claim to know of the existence of any deity, but still believe in such an existence.

Ignosticism
the view that a coherent definition of a deity must be put forward before the question of the existence of a deity can be meaningfully discussed. If the chosen definition isn't coherent, the ignostic holds the noncognitivist view that the existence of a deity is meaningless or empirically untestable. A.J. Ayer, Theodore Drange, and other philosophers see both atheism and agnosticism as incompatible with ignosticism on the grounds that atheism and agnosticism accept "a deity exists" as a meaningful proposition which can be argued for or against. An ignostic cannot even say whether he/she is a theist or a nontheist until a better definition of theism is put forth"
Ar trebui sa raminem la niste chestii practice: nu pot nega o deitate inventata de martieni, atita timp cit nu stiu de ea
 



Subiecte asemănătoare
Subiect Subiect început de Forum Răspunsuri Ultimele Postari
Partener ateu onyx235 Nunta 87 26.03.2011 21:52:20
Suntem crestini, intrebati-ne orice andreicozia Generalitati 133 16.08.2010 23:01:34
Eminescu ateu? pisi Generalitati 39 18.01.2010 16:49:03
De ce sunt ateu agnostic hmiron Teologie si Stiinta 43 30.12.2009 22:51:32
ateu sau crestin? Dan-Virgil Generalitati 33 12.07.2008 21:21:58