Citat:
În prealabil postat de mihailt
|
Sa nu ne imbatam totusi cu apa rece! Chiar daca Ips Anton a participat la intronarea lui Cristea, nu inseamna si ca au si slujit impreuna. Ca si cap al Bisericii esti nevoit sa ai si relatii diplomatice. Ca dovada, iata ce spune chiar episcopul Ieremia al noului ROCOR (cel unit in 2007 cu Patriarhia Moscovei) intr-un interviu in care, impreuna cu alti ierarhi, incearca sa-si justifice participarea la un sobor din acest an impreuna cu episcopi pe care pina mai ieri ii acuzau de erezie:
("Q: Some think that the participation of our hierarchs in these assemblies runs counter to the tradition of ROCOR, and say that such an assembly as this one can ultimately destroy our legacy. How would you reply to these people?")
"A: Until 1965, we participated in similar meetings, we had solid inter-Church relationships; this was under Metropolitan Philaret and Metropolitan Anastassy. Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky), meanwhile, traveled to Romania for the enthronement of the first Romanian Patriarch in 1925, just as the Romanian Church adopted the new calendar. In the description of this event no mention was made of the calendar, so when was the tradition broken? It is hard to find such a moment." (
http://eadiocese.org/News/2010/05/interview.en.htm)
Dupa el, vezi Doamne, ceea ce ierarhii ROCOR fac astazi se inscrie in traditia de diplomatie politica a ROCORului.