|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
21.01.2015, 17:51:30
|
|||
|
|||
Citat:
Raspunsul la intrebarea ta este simplu: DA! Te-as ruga sa nu mai faci supozitii lipsite de sens, ca evidentiezi doar cat de slab pregatit si imatur esti si nu-i frumos. Google sa stii ca nu te face mai destept, doar iti da aceasta iluzie. Last edited by AlbertX; 21.01.2015 at 17:57:20. 
|
|
#2
21.01.2015, 18:13:54
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
E bine ca subscrii modelului sustinut de astronomi de vreo 500 de ani.
|
|
#3
21.01.2015, 18:25:44
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
 ... se pare ca nici cu artimetica nu stai atat de bine.
|
|
#4
21.01.2015, 18:29:53
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicolau...#Heliocentrism 1514* Credeam ca acel "vreo" ar justifica aproximatia.
|
|
#5
21.01.2015, 18:32:55
|
|||
|
|||
|
Citat:
About 1532 Copernicus had basically completed his work on the manuscript of De revolutionibus orbium coelestium; but despite urging by his closest friends, he resisted openly publishing his views, not wishing"as he confessed"to risk the scorn "to which he would expose himself on account of the novelty and incomprehensibility of his theses." Heraclides Ponticus (387 - 312 BCE) proposed that the Earth rotates on its axis. Aristarchus of Samos (310 - 230 BCE) was the first to advance a theory that the earth orbited the sun. Deci, disputa dintre heliocentrsm si geocentrism e de foarte mult timp ... si va fi si in continuare. Last edited by AlbertX; 21.01.2015 at 18:39:30.
|
|
|
Mod hibrid